Considering clustering: a methodological review of clinical decision support system studies
نویسندگان
چکیده
Computer-based clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are often implemented at a cluster level, but standard statistical methods for sample estimation and analysis may not be appropriate for such studies. This review aims to determine whether the design and analysis methods of cluster-based studies were adequately addressed in reports of CDSS studies. We retrieved 61 reports of the CDSS controlled trials and identified 24 studies meeting our inclusion criteria. Of these, none included sample size calculations that allowed for clustering, while 14 (58%) took account of clustering in the analysis. Although there is increasing recognition of the methodological issues associated with cluster design in health care, many medical informaticians are still not aware of these issues. Investigators should publish estimates of the intracluster correlation coefficients and variance components in their reports to guide the planning of the future studies.
منابع مشابه
Applying a decision support system for accident analysis by using data mining approach: A case study on one of the Iranian manufactures
Uncertain and stochastic states have been always taken into consideration in the fields of risk management and accident, like other fields of industrial engineering, and have made decision making difficult and complicated for managers in corrective action selection and control measure approach. In this research, huge data sets of the accidents of a manufacturing and industrial unit have been st...
متن کاملSystem Factors Influencing the Australian Nurses' Evidence-based Clinical Decision Making: A Systematic Review of Recent Studies
Background: There is growing attention to evidence-based practice in Australian clinical contexts and nursing literature. Recent research explores the dimensions of evidence-based practice; however, the implementation of evidence-based clinical decision making has been identified as a cumbersome process. Aim: This study aimed to review the literature syst...
متن کاملClinical decision support system, a potential solution for diagnostic accuracy improvement in oral squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a rapidly progressive disease and despite the progress in the treatment of cancer, remains a life-threatening illness with a poor prognosis. Diagnostic techniques of the oral cavity are not painful, non-invasive, simple and inexpensive methods. Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are the most important diagnostic technologies used...
متن کاملMethodological Note: Neurofeedback: A Comprehensive Review on System Design, Methodology and Clinical Applications
Neurofeedback is a kind of biofeedback, which teaches self-control of brain functions to subjects by measuring brain waves and providing a feedback signal. Neurofeedback usually provides the audio and or video feedback. Positive or negative feedback is produced for desirable or undesirable brain activities, respectively. In this review, we provided clinical and technical inf...
متن کاملDelving Into the Details of Evaluating Public Engagement Initiatives; Comment on “Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization- and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review”
Initiatives to engage the public in health policy decisions have been widely endorsed and used, yet agreed upon methods for systematically evaluating the effectiveness of these initiatives remain to be developed. Dukhanin, Topazian, and DeCamp have thus developed a useful taxonomy of evaluation criteria derived from a systematic review of published evaluation tools that might serve as the basis...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Proceedings. AMIA Symposium
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2000